Is Blood Type Personality Theory Scientific? - The Lie About Type A Being Timid

"You're Type A, so you're timid?" "Type B is self-centered." "Type O has leadership." The blood type personality theory, uniquely prevalent in Korea and Japan. Despite having absolutely no scientific basis, it feels like it's true. This is a perfect example of the Barnum Effect.
Related article: What is the Barnum Effect?
History of Blood Type Personality Theory
Birth Background
1927 Japan
- Developer: Takeji Furukawa (teacher, not a psychology professional)
- Purpose: Classify army soldier personalities
- Basis: None (just belief)
Spread
- Resurgence in Japan in 1970s
- Introduced to Korea in 1990s
- Spread through TV, magazines
- Currently: Unique belief in Korea/Japan
Reality in Korea
Blood Type in Daily Life
- First meeting: "What's your blood type?"
- Dating: "Type A and Type B don't match"
- Workplace: "Type O must have leadership"
- Friends: "So typical of a Type B"
Problems
- Believed as science
- Tool for judging people
- Justifying discrimination and prejudice
Scientific Facts
What is Blood Type?
Medical Definition
- Difference in red blood cell surface antigens
- A antigen, B antigen, AB antigen, O (none)
- Important for transfusions
- Unrelated to personality
Connection to Brain?
- Blood type = Red blood cell surface
- Brain = Nerve cells
- No connection
- Mechanism unknown
Scientific Research Results
Study 1: Japan (1980)
- Participants: 1,000
- Personality test by blood type
- Result: Zero correlation
Study 2: Korea (2005)
- Participants: 2,700
- Compared blood type with Big Five personality
- Result: No statistically significant difference
Study 3: Meta-analysis (2014)
- Combined research from 10 countries (10,000+ participants)
- Conclusion: No correlation between blood type and personality
Scientific Consensus
- "Complete pseudoscience"
- "Zero evidence"
- "Superstition"
Why Does It Feel True?
1. Barnum Effect
Type A Description
"Meticulous and careful.
Tends towards perfectionism.
Considerate of others.
Sometimes considered timid."
Problems
- Applies to everyone
- Vague ("sometimes")
- Dual description ("meticulous but timid")
- → Classic Barnum Effect
Experiment
- Show Type A description to Type B
- "That's totally me!" reaction
- Only label differs, content similar
2. Confirmation Bias
Type A Person
- Acts cautiously → "Typical Type A!"
- Acts boldly → "Exception" (ignored)
Type B Person
- Self-centered behavior → "So Type B!"
- Considerate behavior → "Unusual for Type B" (dismissed)
Result
- Remember only matching instances
- Ignore contradictions
- Illusion of "It really matches!"
3. Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
"I'm Type B, so I'm free-spirited"
- Belief → Influences behavior
- Actually behaves more freely
- Surroundings confirm "Typical Type B"
- → Reinforces belief
Vicious Cycle
Belief → Behavior Change → Social Confirmation → Reinforced Belief
4. Group Think
Social Learning
- Exposed from childhood
- Repeatedly hear "Type A is timid"
- Unconsciously accept
- Believe without doubt
Group Pressure
- "Don't you believe in blood types?" → Treated as strange
- Many believe → Doubt diminishes
- Critical thinking suppressed
"Personality" Analysis of 4 Blood Types
Type A (34% in Korea)
Stereotypes
- Meticulous, careful, timid, perfectionist, considerate
Barnum Effect Analysis
- "Meticulous" = Everyone sometimes meticulous
- "Timid" = Everyone sometimes timid
- "Perfectionist" = Everyone pursues perfection in important matters
Type B (27% in Korea)
Stereotypes
- Self-centered, free-spirited, creative, moody
Barnum Effect Analysis
- "Self-centered" = Everyone has personal needs
- "Free-spirited" = Everyone dislikes constraints
- "Creative" = Ambiguous expression
Type O (28% in Korea)
Stereotypes
- Leadership, sociable, optimistic, bold
Barnum Effect Analysis
- "Leadership" = Everyone in certain situations
- "Sociable" = Everyone with comfortable people
- "Bold" = Everyone sometimes
Type AB (11% in Korea)
Stereotypes
- Dual-natured, unique, genius-like, multi-dimensional
Barnum Effect Analysis
- "Dual-natured" = Everyone varies by situation
- "Unique" = Everyone is unique
- "Genius-like" = Pleasant-sounding (unproven)
Actual Damage Cases
1. Dating Discrimination
Case
- "Won't date Type B men"
- Breakup due to blood type
- Forced relationships based on "compatibility"
Problems
- Discrimination without scientific basis
- Missing good people
- Judging relationships by blood type
2. Hiring Discrimination
Real Case (Japan)
- "Type A only" job postings
- Blood type questions in interviews
- Placement decisions based on blood type
Legal Issues
- Discriminatory practices
- No scientific basis
- Difficult to prosecute
3. School Bullying
Cases
- Labeling "Type B is selfish"
- Ostracism based on blood type
- Mocking "Type AB is weird"
Impact
- Decreased self-esteem
- Identity confusion
- Self-doubt: "Am I really like that?"
4. Self-Limitation
"I'm Type A, so I can't be a leader"
- Not trying despite capability
- Blood type as an excuse
- Self-blocking growth opportunities
In Other Countries
Western Countries
Reaction
- "Personality by blood type? Hilarious"
- Scientific thinking prevails
- Few believe in astrology
Differences
- Individualistic culture
- Strengthened scientific education
- Critical thinking training
Japan
Current Status
- Similar prevalence as Korea
- Common TV program topic
- Increasing criticism recently
Changes
- "Blood Type Harassment" recognized social issue since late 2000s
- Spreading discrimination awareness
- Growing critical perspective
Korea's Uniqueness
Why Specifically Korea/Japan?
- Collectivist culture → Preference for classification
- Need for conversation topics
- Lack of scientific thinking education
- Uncritical media spread
Healthy Attitude
DO ✅
1. Just for Fun
- Light conversation: "Oh, you're Type A~"
- Icebreaking tool
- Don't take seriously
2. Distinguish Science vs Superstition
- Blood type = Medicine (transfusion)
- Personality = Psychology (Big Five)
- Completely unrelated
3. Respect Individual Differences
- Even same blood type varies
- Environment, education, experience more important
- Don't judge people by labels
DON'T ❌
1. Believe as Science
- "Blood type is scientific" (Incorrect)
- Zero evidence
2. Use as Judgment Tool
- "Type B must be selfish" (Discrimination)
- "Type A and Type B don't match" (Prejudice)
3. Use for Important Decisions
- Dating, hiring, relationships
- Never decide based on blood type
4. Impose on Children
- "You're Type A, so you must be cautious"
- Limits self
- Hinders growth
Learn More
- What is the Barnum Effect?
- Is MBTI Scientific or a Scam?
- Psychology of Astrology and Tarot
- Barnum Statements Used by Scammers
Conclusion
Blood type personality theory is a superstition, not science. It feels true because of the Barnum Effect.
Scientific Facts
- Zero Correlation - Proven by dozens of studies
- No Mechanism - Red blood cells unrelated to brain
- Developed by Non-Professional - 1927 Japanese teacher
- Believed Only in Korea/Japan - Not recognized globally
Why It Seems True?
- Barnum Effect - Descriptions apply to everyone
- Confirmation Bias - Remember only matching instances
- Self-Fulfilling Prophecy - Behave as believed
- Group Think - Believe because everyone else does
Actual Damages
- Dating discrimination ("Won't date Type B")
- Hiring discrimination (blood type restrictions)
- Bullying (blood type stigma)
- Self-limitation ("Can't do it, I'm Type A")
Healthy Attitude
- ✅ OK for fun
- ✅ OK as conversation topic
- ❌ NOT scientific
- ❌ NOT for judging people
- ❌ NOT for important decisions
Remember
- Blood type important for transfusions (medicine)
- Personality shaped by experience, environment, choices (psychology)
- Completely unrelated
Alternative
- Want to know real personality? → Take Big Five test
- Scientific basis
- Can actually predict behavior
"It's not because you're Type A, it's because you're you."
Your blood type doesn't define you. Your choices and actions define you! 🩸❌